Stacey L. Mills

After recently ending her tenure as a member of the firm, Stacey is now of counsel to the firm. She has a wealth of experience litigating class and other complex litigation. She was one of the lead lawyers most actively involved on behalf of the plaintiff class in In re Travel Agency Commission Antitrust Litigation (D. Minn.) (antitrust claims on behalf of travel agents against major domestic airlines). Most recently, she has been involved in In re AOL Time Warner Securities Litigation (S.D.N.Y.) (securities fraud claims on behalf of AOL and Time Warner shareholders); In re High Pressure Laminates Antitrust Litigation (S.D.N.Y.) (price fixing claims by businesses against manufacturers of high pressure laminates); In re Fiber Optic Cable Litigation (N.D. Ill.) (claims on behalf of property owners alleging that telecoms installed facilities within rights of way without consent); and In re Broadcom Corp. Securities Litigation (C.D. Cal.) (securities fraud claims on behalf of Broadcom shareholders).

Among other cases in which Ms. Mills has been involved are In re Green Tree Financial Stock Litig. (D. Minn.); In re Grand Casinos, Inc. Sec. Litig. (D. Minn.); In re Buffets, Inc. Sec. Litig. (D. Minn.); In re Mercury Finance Co. Sec. Litig. (N.D. Ill.); In re Digi International, Inc. Sec. Litig. (D. Minn.); In re Olympic Financial Sec. Litig. (D. Minn.); In re Policy Management Systems Corp. Secs. Litig. (D.S.C.); In re High-Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust Litig. (C.D. Ill.); Jong Lee v. Summit Medical Systems, Inc. (D. Minn.); In re Tricord Systems, Inc. Sec. Litig. (D. Minn.); and In re NASDAQ Market-Makers Antitrust Litig. (S.D.N.Y.); In re Scimed Life Sec. Litig. (D. Minn.), A & J Deutscher Family Fund v. Bullard (C.D. Cal.); In re Unioil Sec. Litig. (C.D. Cal.); In re Cousins Sec. Litig. (S.D. Cal.); In re Daisy Systems (N.D. Cal.); In re HMOA Sec. Litig. (N.D. Ill.); In re Employee Benefit Plans Sec. Litig. (D. Minn.); Guenther v. Cooper Life Sciences (N.D. Cal.); In re Tera Sec. Litig. (N.D. Cal.); In re Technical Equities Sec. Litig. (N.D. Cal.); Krasner v. Mitchell (Cal. Super. Ct. Los Angeles); Kurgen v. Boise (C.D. Cal.); Levy v. Eletr (N.D. Cal.); Mirochnick v. Glasky (C.D. Cal.); Shields v. Smith (N.D. Cal.); Steiner v. Whittaker Corp. (Cal. Super. Ct. Los Angeles); Thau v. Johnson (S.D. Cal.); The Clothestime Sec. Litig. (C.D. Cal.); Weinberger v. Kwiker (C.D. Cal.); and Weinberger v. Liebel (S.D. Cal.).

Stacey has also represented plaintiffs asserting derivative claims on behalf of corporations in complex civil actions, including Goldman v. Belzberg (Cal. Super. Ct. Los Angeles) (on behalf of FarWest Savings & Loan Association); Grobow v. Dingman, (S.D. Cal.) (on behalf of The Henley Group, Inc.); In re Lockheed Corp. Sec. Litig. (C.D. Cal.); Pacific Gas & Elec. Shareholder Derivative Litig. (Cal. Super. Ct. San Francisco); and Seaman v. Pratt, (Cal. Super. Ct. Orange Co.) (on behalf of Pfizer Inc.).